Guidant Response: Gold Entering a Bear Market

December 21st, 2011 | Posted in Economy, From Allen's Desk, Investment | Subscribe to RSS

News Brief By: Allen G. Yee

Gold has historically been viewed as a safe haven during uncertain economic times; will it be different this time?  Despite the debt issues in Europe and the sustainability of the US and Chinese economy gold is off its recent highs.  However, could it be a worthwhile asset to own and hold particularly as the economic and debt issues will not abate soon?  The answer really depends on an individual’s circumstance such as risk tolerance, time horizon, economic/market view, etc.

*PLEASE NOTE: The information above being provided is strictly as a courtesy. When you link to any of the sites provided here, you are leaving this site. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided at these web sites. Nor is the company liable for any direct or indirect technical or system issues or any consequences arising out of your access to or your use of third-party technologies, web sites, information and programs made available through this web site. When you access one of these web sites, you are leaving our web site and assume total responsibility and risk for your use of the web sites you are linking to. Registered Representatives Offering securities Offered Through First Allied Securities, Inc. Registered Broker-Dealer Member FINRASIPC. Allen Yee, CEA, RFC, CA Insurance License #0747874

Gold is nearing bear market territory even as economic fear persists. 4 reasons why gold has lost its luster

By Nin-Hai Tseng, writer-reporter

Gold prices are nearing bear market territory, and yet the global economic fear that drove many investors to the metal remains. What gives?

FORTUNE – For the 11th year in a row, gold prices have rallied, making this one of the longest winning streaks for the yellow metal. And for most of 2011, it seemed like nothing could stop prices from climbing — gold prices peaked in September at more than $1,900 an ounce.

But in recent months, many high-profile investors have sold their positions, suggesting that gold’s glory days could be coming to an end.

Read Full Story Here

Tags: , ,

Guidant Response: Greece Bond Swap Deal

December 21st, 2011 | Posted in Economy, From Allen's Desk | Subscribe to RSS

News Brief By: Allen G. Yee

The situation in Greece could be a prelude to what can happen in other parts of the EU.  The Greeks have spent all the money and are looking for others to pay; the negotiated 50% discount in bond repayment isn’t enough.  They want a discount closer to 75% and the banks are pushing back, saying its way too low.  One thing is certain, wealth will evaporate.

*PLEASE NOTE: The information above being provided is strictly as a courtesy. When you link to any of the sites provided here, you are leaving this site. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided at these web sites. Nor is the company liable for any direct or indirect technical or system issues or any consequences arising out of your access to or your use of third-party technologies, web sites, information and programs made available through this web site. When you access one of these web sites, you are leaving our web site and assume total responsibility and risk for your use of the web sites you are linking to. Registered Representatives Offering securities Offered Through First Allied Securities, Inc. Registered Broker-Dealer Member FINRASIPC. Allen Yee, CEA, RFC, CA Insurance License #0747874

Greek debt talks hit trouble as hedge fund walks out

By Lefteris Papadimas and Tommy Wilkes

ATHENS/LONDON (Reuters) – Talks over restructuring part of Greece’s massive public debt ran into trouble on Tuesday as one fund walked away from negotiations, fueling growing doubts about whether a deal that is crucial to a new bailout agreement can be reached this year.

Vega Asset Management, a Madrid-based fund, resigned from the steering committee representing private creditors negotiating a voluntary restructuring of Greek government bonds, two sources familiar with the situation said.

Read Full Story Here

Tags: , , ,

Canary in a Coal Mine

November 30th, 2011 | Posted in Economy | Subscribe to RSS

By Allen G. Yee

Have you ever wondered what the saying “canary in a coal mine” meant or where it originated?  In the early 20th century, canaries served as sentinels and were brought into coal mines to serve as early-warning signals for toxic gases such as methane and carbon monoxide.  A bit of a crude method of detection before the advent of electronic gas monitors, yet decidedly necessary.  As these small birds became ill or died, it prompted miners to escape or put on respirators.

For those of you that follow my posts or frequently read financial publications, you know that businesses love to use analogies.  In this analogy, the part of the fragile, yellow bird in the depths of the coal mine will be played by Greece.  And the dark and toxic coal mine is referring to the European Union.  However, while we are laying out the setting of our analogy, it is important to note that there is other government debt, including the United States that could represent other coal mines.  Sovereign European debt concerns surfaced in late 2009 as the term PIGS (Portugal, Italy, Greece, Spain) was coined.  Since then, Greece has been leading the way with its continued sick debt issues.  On November 3, 2011, Greek two-year bond yields surged over 100% for the first time.  This is a clear indicator that investors are signaling the demise of Greek debt, i.e. they will default.  And as Greece, the canary, becomes sicker the question is who’s next and what does the European Union do?  The who’s next part is fairly easy…everybody except Germany.   Which leads to what Germany/EU will do?

Does anyone think that Germany has been sitting idle while everything has been unraveling around them and contagion spreading?  Staying consistent with our analogy, Germany may be looking to take a bigger leadership role over the miners, or escape from the coal mine altogether.  With so much to at stake, it’s obviously conceivable that Germany would be calculating a means of either increasing their position in the EU or creating a way to leave the union.   I recently read an article on Seeking Alpha titled Report: Germans About To Launch Bomb Within Heart Of Europe.  In a nut shell the article outlines Germany’s power play move – In order to continue their support, Germany will insist on changing the voting mechanism within the ECB Governing Council.  Currently, each member has one vote irrespective to size, GDP, etc.  The Germans will push to have that vote changed to be representative of GDP, under which they would have 27 votes out of 100, and France would have 21.  This would in essence give Germany and France (along with another ally) control of the ECB (European Central Bank) and dictate policy to the other member states.  However, it seems unlikely that the ECB would entertain such move.  Yet, perhaps that is what the Germans are hoping for, paving a path for Germany’s exodus of EU. 

I think that the current discussion of the EU’s problems create more questions than answers.  What if Germany’s tactic doesn’t work?  Will this ultimately cause the demise of the EU?  What happens to the EU if Germany leaves?  What happens to the Euro (currency)?  In my opinion, there is no easy or quick resolution to this mess.  The fear of contagion will continue to rock the Euro (currency) and could trade at parity to the dollar in the next year.  The uncertainty along with the possibility of sovereign government default will cause havoc in the markets. 

 

 

Sources:

Seeking Alpha – http://seekingalpha.com/article/307732-report-germans-about-to-launch-bomb-within-heart-of-europe?ifp=0&source=email_the_daily_dispatch

 

Greek Bond Yields – http://www.businessweek.com/news/2011-11-03/greek-yield-rises-over-100-italian-bonds-drop-on-eu-ultimatum.html

 

Housing Still Is and Will Remain a Mess, for a Long Time…

November 21st, 2011 | Posted in Economy, Investment | Subscribe to RSS

By Allen G. Yee

During these turbulent and uncertain times, one of the most frequent questions I am asked is my opinion of the status of real estate and whether or not it has bottomed.  To clarify, there are many types of real estate; industrial, office, retail, multi-family and residential to name the most common.  Since most of my real estate questions refer to residential housing, that is the area in which I will focus.

Recently, Professor Robert Shiller of Yale University and co-creator of the Case-Shiller Housing Index stated he believed that prices could decrease another 10 to 25% from current prices and will not bottom out for many years.  There is a shadow inventory of homes either held back intentionally or that have yet to complete the foreclosure process.  This could be an ominous signal that an avalanche of homes could be coming to an already over saturated market, further depressing prices.  You can watch the interview here.

To further enforce the point, in Harry Dent’s book The Great Crash Ahead, he warns that real estate has not bottomed and that people may be sucked into purchasing real estate because it is seemingly cheap.  Further, he believes America is in the midst of a major restructuring in the US economy, which includes a sediment change in how Americans view real estate.  The demographic demand for starter homes will begin first but not until echo boomers can afford starter homes, which would be 4-5 years away assuming the economy improves.

My view is that combined with economic issues, much of the housing concerns can also be attributed to a large demographic shift.  Most residential housing is owned by older generations.  The Greatest Generation (born from 1901-1924), Silent Generation (born from 1925-1945) and Baby Boom Generation (born from 1946-1964) own a substantial amount of residential housing, not only their primary residence, but rentals as well.  The landlords in this group have had to deal with the 3-T’s of rental properties: Tenants, Toilets, and Taxes!!  As they age, they become more eager to exit the rental game.  In my opinion, many of the members of these generations are looking to downsize their portfolio of property.  This act of property reduction is much like an inverted pyramid.  As they age, it becomes difficult to manage multiple rental properties and they look to sell.  As children grow and leave the house, they look to downsize their primary residence to a smaller home.  Perhaps after, is yet an even smaller condo.  And for many, a 300 square-foot room in an assisted living facility. The question is who will buy this huge inventory of homes?  Generation X (born roughly between 1965 and 1980) is next in line.  While they may purchase primary homes, they only have 46 million members.  And like me, those who grew up helping mom and dad with the 3-T’s of rentals have been traumatized, and are more adverse to owning rentals.  So how are they going to absorb roughly 80+ million baby boomers and prior generation’s real estate?  I believe they won’t.   Some will be purchased by younger generations, many by institutions, but since there will undoubtedly be a greater supply than demand, housing will reset to prices below our normal comprehension on a general basis.  However, remember real estate is a unique product and no two are alike.  So remember the adage- location, location, location followed up by employment, employment, employment.

 

Link above is to: http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-ticker/shiller-house-prices-probably-won-t-hit-bottom-162755874.html

What’s the future for Social Security?

September 13th, 2011 | Posted in Economy, Retirement | Subscribe to RSS

By Allen G. Yee

Did the recent debate over the debt ceiling ring any bells about what could be in the cards for Social Security?  As America continues to battle with our economy and the government continues to attempt to prop it up with stimulus plans filled with tax reductions and spending, debates over our ever increasing mountain of debt will continue.

Recently, AARP agreed that reform with Social Security is necessary or will suffer an ill-fate.  I’m certain it was a very difficult decision for the leaders at AARP to publically admit that Social Security requires some tinkering.  It certainly confirms what I (as well as numerous more prominent financial professionals) have been saying for a long time, that Social Security cannot survive in its current form.  Social Security was initially designed in the 1920’s and enacted in 1935 by FDR as part of his “New Deal.”  Our country as well as society has changed significantly since then.  In particular, life expectancy and demographics have given way to an environment in which current Social Security cannot survive.  Today, the average American life expectancy is north 80 years old compared to 62 when the entitlement program began.  Further, when the benefits began there were approximately 42 workers supporting one benefit recipient.  Today, it’s about 3 to one.  Add the enormous amount of baby boomers set to retire and it’s easy to tell the math no longer works.

Between Social Security and Medicare, Social Security is relatively easy to fix.  Medicare has at least six times the unfunded liability of Social Security.  Yet, there was not one word about Medicare in AARP’s pronouncement.

Title: Key Senior Association Pivots on Benefit Cuts

www.wsj.com (The Wall Street Journal, June 17, 2011; Front Page)

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304186404576389760955403414.html

 

Title: AARP expects Social Security benefit cuts

www.money.cnn.com (CNN Money, June 17, 2011)

http://money.cnn.com/2011/06/17/news/economy/aarp_social_security/index.htm

 

Title: AARP Says It’s Open to Modest Social Security Cuts

www.nytimes.com (The New York Times, June 18, 2011; section A, page 12)

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/18/us/18aarp.html

 

It Was Nice While it Lasted…

August 11th, 2011 | Posted in Economy, Taxes | Subscribe to RSS

By Allen G. Yee

What am I talking about you ask?  Mortgage interest deduction!

Quietly at work is a bipartisan group of U.S. Senators (referred to as the Gang of Six) who are closing in on proposals that they hope may be the best solutions for reducing the national deficit crisis.  Among the many topics and remedies they have discussed is the reduction or possible elimination of mortgage interest deduction for homeowners.  This suggestion has thus far has received bipartisan support.

Many believe that mortgage interest deduction is seen as promoting homeownership and drives greater demand for real estate, which has become debatable recently.  During the Tax Reform Act (TRA) of 1986 the tax deductibility of interest was stripped away for all personal items with the exception of mortgage interest.  This was likely because of the effort of lobbyist and industry groups.

Fast forward-  add enormous and mounting debt, polarization of Americans, political emphasis on federal budget reduction and mortgage interest deduction is under scrutiny and a prime target in the race to make some breathing room.

It’s intuitive but worth noting that the benefits of mortgage interest deduction is disproportionate and based on one’s income.  This model means the wealthy accrue a greater benefit than the middle-class and low-income Americans.  Low-income earners rent and do not own, so they receive no benefit from the deduction.  The middle-class homes cost substantially less than wealthy American homes and thus have less interest deductions.  Households earning more than $200,000 a year account for less than 10% of the all Federal income tax returns, but get 30% of all the benefits.  And households earning more than $100,000 a year get 69% of all the benefit*.  The mortgage interest deduction might be billed as a middle-class tax break, but realistically it’s a tax break for the upper-class.

There are arguments on both sides regarding the merits and lack thereof in the motive behind reducing or eliminating mortgage interest deductions.  I expect a hotly contested struggle over the issue as I don’t see Americans giving up one of the last deductions available without a fight.  Nor, do I expect to see special interest groups like the National Association of Realtors accept this lightly.  It will be interesting to see what happens here.  The solution could be to phase out the deduction slowly, say over a 10 or 20 year period which could gain support from both current homeowners and those looking to solve our fiscal woes.

 

http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2011/07/12/chart-of-the-day-where-does-the-mortgage-interest-deduction-go/

The Patient is Back to ICU

August 10th, 2011 | Posted in Economy | Subscribe to RSS

By Allen G. Yee

The patient I’m referring to is the US Economy. Over the last couple of years I have paralleled the US Economy to a hospital patient that is so ill; it was in the intensive care unit.  In my analogy, the attending physicians (The Fed and Ben Bernake), reminiscent of an episode of House, have been scrambling to diagnose and prescribe (almost) everything in their repertoire to keep this patient alive.  The most recent of which is an IV bag we call QE2.  After administering this stimulant, the patient looked well enough to take off life support, and we were anxious to see if it could continue unassisted.

Apparently, the patient wasn’t as stable as once perceived and the true health issues have not been addressed.  In fact, many indicators are pointing the conclusion that the recession never truly ended.  I bet the folks that have been unemployment for the last two years could’ve have told our “attending physicians” how sick the patient really was.  Recently the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) highlighted the fact that our recession ran deeper and, in my opinion, continues to impact us now.  The BEA recently released:

“For 2007-2010, real GDP decreased at an average annual rate of 0.3 percent; in the previously published estimates, real GDP had increased at an average annual rate of less than 0.1 percent. From the fourth quarter 0f 2007 to the first quarter of 2011, real GDP decreased at an average annual rate of 0.2 percent; in the previously published estimates, real GDP had increased at an average annual rate of 0.2 percent.“

My interpretation of this information is that we never truly emerged from the recession, despite what Uncle Sam, Ben, Tim and their friends may say.

The article below by Richard Davis of Consumer Metrics Institutes casts a much clearer light the Great Recession.

http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2011/07/great-recession-far-worse.html

Now that the Washington has taken center stage with the debate and negotiations over the US Debt Ceiling, the circus will continue.  Much of the political chicken has been played believing the theatrics will not harm our economy.  Well the theatrics have hurt.  US Debt just lost its AAA credit rating from Standard and Poors.  Uncertainty breeds risk aversion and economies (US and others) need participants (consumers and business) to take risks.  The politicians believed a bipartisan agreement would mean business as usual and the economy would continue on its current state.  Unfortunately this is not the case.

The real question should be “what now?”

At my most recent Quarterly Workshop held on July 20th, I discussed the current status of our economy as seen from both an optimistic and pessimistic view.  After, I described my belief that the economic patient will fall ill again in 6-12 months.  In the short-term, I would not be surprised if the Fed (Bernanke) prescribes another round of stimulus in an effort to support the economy. This dosage of medication (stimulus) will have limited effect and in 6-12 months or when the Fed withdraws again, the patient will once again fall ill.  And at that point, despite what the attending physicians may prescribe, it may not effectively avoid another (continued) recession.

In my belief, continued volatility can be expected to persist.  The equity markets (domestic and international) will have wide swings both positive and negative on a daily basis.  Asset classes (stocks, bonds, commodities and real estate) will continue to increase in correlation and diversification in different asset classes will have less and less effect in reducing portfolio volatility. Bubbles will form in commodities and bonds. 

It is imperative to review your risk tolerance, time horizon and most importantly your investment strategy.  There is certainly hope- there’s still quite a bit the attending physicians can prescribe and this patient has quite a bit of fight.  Only time will reveal the direction of our economic health both in the short and long term.

The U.S. Debt Limit: Questions and Answers

July 19th, 2011 | Posted in Economy | Subscribe to RSS

As August 2 approaches, you’ll likely hear increasingly urgent debate over the nation’s debt ceiling. That’s the approximate date by which the Treasury estimates it will no longer be able to borrow under the current $14.3 trillion limit. Treasury officials have warned that if the Treasury can no longer borrow money, the U.S. might default on its existing obligations–in other words, be unable to make payments it already owes, whether those be for Treasury securities or government programs.

President Obama, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke have warned that not raising the debt limit would have severe consequences. Leaders of both parties have said that the issue must be addressed, and have put forward proposals for tying any increase to tackling the country’s budget deficit. However, they differ on how to begin to reduce that deficit.

While the debate is taking place right now, here are some answers to frequently asked questions that might help you understand the issues involved.

What is the debt ceiling?

The debt ceiling represents a limit on the amount the U.S. Treasury is allowed to borrow to manage the national debt (the total amount currently owed by the U.S. government). Before World War I, Congress often approved the terms of individual debt instruments issued by the Treasury to pay for spending authorized by Congress, including maturities, interest rates, and the types of financial instruments used. Eventually, members decided in 1939 to set an overall limit on the total amount the Treasury could borrow to pay the nation’s bills without congressional authorization.

An increase in the debt limit does not authorize additional governmental spending; only Congress can approve future spending. However, Treasury officials have said that if the limit is not raised, the government would not be able to pay bills that have already been incurred. According to the Congressional Research Service (an arm of Congress), the debt ceiling has been increased 78 times since 1960 (10 times just since 2001), under both Democratic and Republican administrations.

The national debt has two aspects. Debt held by the public occurs when investors buy debt instruments sold by the Treasury to finance budget deficits and pay bills; it represents almost two-thirds of the current debt. Debt held by government accounts is created when the Treasury borrows from government accounts such as the Social Security, Medicare, and Transportation trust funds.

What would happen if the debt ceiling isn’t raised?

There’s no way to know the precise or full impact, since a default on the country’s obligations is unprecedented in U.S. history. However, the Treasury is responsible for payment of a broad range of obligations that include not only Treasury bonds, notes, and bills, but also Social Security and Medicare benefits, military salaries, interest on the current national debt, and tax refunds, to name only a few.

Technically, the $14.3 trillion ceiling was exceeded in May. However, the Treasury has been able to use certain accounting measures to temporarily extend the nation’s ability to borrow.

Bond rating agencies have already warned that an interruption in or curtailing of payments owed by the U.S. government would harm the nation’s credit rating, which is currently among the highest in the world. If that happened, or if the country actually had to default or restructure payment schedules, greater uncertainty about the United States’ ability to pay its bills would mean that both domestic and foreign investors would likely demand higher interest rates for buying Treasury securities.

Those higher interest rates would increase the country’s borrowing costs, making the national debt problem even worse in the long term. They might also result in higher interest rates for other, nongovernmental loans such as mortgages, which some observers worry could hamper economic recovery. And even if there were technically no default, the mere absence of an agreement that addresses the issue before August 2 would likely raise the global anxiety level substantially.

Haven’t we survived government shortfalls in the past?

Governmental funding gaps have occurred more than a dozen times in the last three decades, according to the Congressional Research Service. The most recent was in 1995-1996, when the failure of the Clinton administration and the Republican-led Congress to reach agreement on a spending bill led to a temporary government-wide shutdown. However, never in the country’s history has it failed to pay its legal obligations–one reason why Treasury securities have historically been considered one of the safest investments in the world.

 

 

Forefield, Inc. Copyright 2011 Forefield, Inc.